
Body mulls affordable housing rules
December 7, 2006; As originally appeared in The Hour by
Patrick R. Linsey, Hour Staff Writer
NORWALK
-- The Zoning Commission heard arguments for and against a
proposed mandatory affordable housing regulation at a public
hearing Wednesday night. City developers and business leaders
are in favor of the plan, which requires the building of affordable
“work-force housing” units with some new multi-family
properties.
Attorney David Waters represents two Norwalk
developers and said his clients are in favor of the regulation.
“ This type of regulation is a good
idea,” Waters said. “I think developers are generally
socially conscious people.”
Waters added that a uniform affordable-housing
standard lets developers know what to expect when planning
a project.
Also speaking in favor of the regulation was
Greater Norwalk Chamber of Commerce President Edward J. Musante.
“ Affordable work-force housing is a
critical issue for Norwalk — especially for the business
community” Musante said. “Even today, our region
is at full employment … Many more jobs are on the way.
Just look at developments that are on the drawing board.”
But several speakers questioned what other
communities are doing to address the problem. While city planner’s
estimate 10.4 percent of Norwalk’s housing meets the
state’s definition of affordable, the surrounding towns
of Darien, Westport and Greenwich all have less than 5 percent.
“ Why is Norwalk a dumping ground for
affordable housing?” asked city resident David Park.
Park said he chafes at the term “work-force
housing” employed by the commission.
“ I live in a market-rate unit. Does
that mean I don’t work?” he asked.
As now written, the Work- force Housing Regulation would require
developers building multi-family housing developments with
20 or more units to price at least 10 percent of those units
within reach of persons, or families, earning up to 80 percent
of the state median income.
That translates to an income of up to $37,156
for a single person, or up to $71,455 for a four- person family,
based on 2006 data by the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services.
Developers would be given a density bonus
if they placed an additional 5 percent of on-site units within
reach of those earning up to 60 percent of the state median
income, and yet 5 percent more in reach of those making up
to 100 percent of the state median incomes.
Waters called for language restricting bonuses
to on-site units to be broadened to include units within several
parcels that comprise a development zone.
Former Zoning Commission Chairwoman Dorothy
Mobilia spoke in favor of the affordable housing regulation.
Also speaking in support were representatives from several
not-for-profit foundations, including Joan Carty executive
director of the Stamford-based Housing Development Fund.
“ I think you have an excellent framework here for starting
an implementation process,” Carty said. “There
are always people who are priced-out if they don’t have
this kind of opportunity.”
In the end, the commission sent the regulation
back to committee to consider proposed modifications.
Staff writer Robert Koch contributed to this
report. Staff writer Patrick B. Linsey can be reached via
e-mail at plinsey@thehourcom,
|